So even if we do throw NDAs to the wind and publish a fix, it may not actually be a fix when the real Lion ships, so us taking on that danger would end up pointless. *And the UUIDs won't necessarily be the same from a seed to a release. Please don't put us in the position of having to answer to Apple Legal for an NDA violation.
Pushing a change to our public repository that includes Lion UUIDs would be publishing “Apple Confidential Information” (as the NDA puts it). Likewise, any Growl developers who have seed access are bound by the same NDA. Those UUIDs are part of the seeded OS, so they're covered by that NDA, so you're bound by your NDA not to tell us or anyone else what they are until Lion ships*. You agree to that NDA when you sign up to get seeded with OS betas. That said, when it does break, it's OK to report bugs.īut Lion-and everything in it-is under an NDA. Or people updating their OS the hour after it's released understanding what they are getting into. > Or people who are beta testing operating systems actually understanding what they are getting into. On Mar 18, 2011, at 12:56:11, Christopher Forsythe wrote: The practice remains to treat those UUIDs from pre-releases as if Or they were refused if they did, because from what I've observed here, That it has UUIDs that match Mail and the Message framework, is actuallyīut apparently nobody has ever tried to get permission to use them, How long it takes to _test_ the assertion that the plugin, by advertising
#Growlmail review update
Updated after an OS update could perhaps be eliminated (depending on If permission wasn't a problem, much of the delay getting the plugin
Useless to anyone not running the matching pre-release and in principle, It's really a stupid restriction, because the UUIDs would be completely I imagine one of the folks that controls the list will have to delete You do _not_ want to post those UUIDs from a pre-release version,īecause that may be a violation of the non-disclosure agreement (NDA). Unfortunately, you missed one thing that I would have mentioned: Was already to send an explanation, and you beat me to it.